Like most English teachers I have
used technology as a tool to deliver information to students, or house
information for students. I have used
the Smart Board in the room to show snippets of films that are related to our
reading. I have also created websites
for students to reference class notes and find assignments. In the past I created Web quests for younger
grades to help them do research.
However, how much of the technology in my room is a real partner for
students in their quest for meaningful learning?
Most of my
reflection this week is focused on my 11AP Literature and Composition
class. One of the theories of meaningful
learning states that teachers need to be able to articulate how students need
to think in order for them to truly learn.
This is one of the biggest obstacles in teaching. Teachers need to teach students to think to
learn, and not for the purposes of giving the teacher the “right” answer, but
to have students become more analytical thinkers. To this end, the first thing
I teach them is how to annotate. Only by
being active readers can they effectively analyze text and be able to express
themselves in their writing. I emphasize
that annotations are personal, with no right or wrong answer. That being said,
I also emphasize that they need to be able to support their theories with
examples found in the text. Since the majority of the works we use can be found
online, through Project Gutenberg (gutenberg.org), students have the option of
using the website Scrible.com, which allows them to add sticky notes to an
online text. Students like that they can
color coordinate their notes for easier referencing.
The AP
classes are also working on a website of their own. It will be their study guide and will be
housed within our class website. The
students are using Weebly to construct the site and are working in groups. I don’t tell them what needs to go on their
study guide; instead we brainstorm ideas of what they might like to see
there. They then work in groups to
create the materials while one group works on the creation of the site. The work is done in my room with
Chromebooks. This is really handy since
each group is able to work on the same document at the same time. I am also able to see what they are working
on and comment in real time as they work.
The one requirement I ask of them is that each segment of the study
guide needs to be interactive. I don’t want pages of notes, but rather tools to
help them check their understanding of the material. So far the groups have created vocabulary
quizzes, Jeopardy style games based on some of the novels read, and one group
is working on a quest type of video game using Hamlet and the use of ethos, pathos, and logos in the play. The
students are using a tool that requires no coding, and they are enjoying the
process. The website is scratch.mit.edu.
My twelfth graders recently had to
write a research paper. I broke up the
assignment into various parts. The first
part was all about them. I wanted this
paper to mean something to them, so I asked them to think about a social issue
that they cared about. They needed to
write down everything they knew about the subject and then write eight to ten
questions they had on the topic. These
questions drove their research. My school district subscribes to various
databases, and I chose SIRS by ProQuest to have my students begin their
investigations. Articles are arranged by
subject and date on the database, making it easy for students to find the
latest information on their topic.
However, they were allowed to use Google, and I spent time reviewing how
to discern which websites were reliable. Using Google docs students were able
to help each other through the various editing stages of their research and,
later, of their paper. I believe that my having students choose their social
issue, and create their own guiding questions makes the research a more
authentic task.
I also used
Google classroom to have the students turn in their assignments. Docupus and Goobric, both additions to Google
Sheets, work with Google classroom to allow me to attach a rubric to the
assignment, grade the work, and then share it with the student. The students receive my comments, as well as
the rubric, and a grade. I haven’t
experimented with allowing students to use Docupus as an editing tool yet, but
it is something I will attempt soon.
Overall,
I believe that I am making strides in having technology be a partner in my
students’ learning, however, there is still more that can be done.
No comments:
Post a Comment